INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT

Annual Quality Assurance Report(AQAR) - 2020-2021

AQAR-2020-21

Metric

No.

2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome

2.6.1.

 QlM

  Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are       stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students.

  Describe Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes and mechanism of    communication within a minimum of 200 characters and maximum of 200 words 

Program Outcomes (POs), Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Course Outcomes (COs) are framed by the department following extensive consultation with all faculty and stakeholders, in strict conformity with the objectives of Outcome Based Education (OBE). Following the achievement of consensus, the information is extensively disseminated and popularized via various methods described below.

  • Website
  • Department Notice Boards
  • Meetings with employers
  • Laboratories
  • Library
  • Induction Programs
  • Faculty meetings
  • Parent meet
  • Alumni meetings

The HODs along with the faculty members provide information to students, raise awareness, and stress the importance of achieving the goals.Specified skill requirements to be met by students at the micro level and by the end of the programme known as PSOs. The PSOs are normally prepared by the programme coordinators in cooperation with course coordinators. The BOS of each department, will discuss and approve the proposal after approval by the Principal.

Link for relevant documents:

Link for thePO, PSO & PEO (Electronics & Communication Engineering Department):

https://sites.google.com/a/iemcal.com/iem-department-of-electronics-communication-engineering/course/po-pso-peo?authuser=0

 

Link for thePO, PSO & PEO(Electrical & Electronics Engineering  Department):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ym0_HRB1yPKSerbshQUhN0FaLJdUE7gN/view?usp=sharing

 

Link for thePO, PSO & PEO(Computer Engineering  Department):

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t1kphNx8QpbiZys4zkhTqYL2FDx0JaBL/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

 Link for syllabus for Autonomous batch(Computer Engineering  Department Batch 2020-2024):

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FjUBPNhBfslD7P4ZOP5XZ1S9YOijcaER/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

Link for syllabus for Autonomous batch(Computer Engineering Department Batch 2019-2023)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wJaTM9UUgjWpN1nrUwJeKfit1GWT-ueI/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

Link for syllabus Makaut batch (Computer Engineering  Department):

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d8YLuDKk7QeDCnIQnR0N6xxJ-p_Gy8aQ/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

 

2.6.2.

 

QlM

Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.

Describe the method of measuring the level of attainment of POs , PSOs and COs in not more than 200

Each course contains a set of COs and evaluation criteria that must be met. The course results are mapped to the POs.Through the mapping of questions to COs and COs to POs and PSOs, the students’ performance on examinations over the semester in each course is utilised to compute the level of achievement of the POs and PSOs

The process of course outcome assessment is by direct or indirect method.The direct method consists of Mid Examinations andSemester End Examination. The indirect assessment is done through the course end survey.

Rubrics are framed for the assessments.

The attainment of each CO is computed by setting the class average mark as the target. The COs of each course are mapped to POs & PSOs with weightages of 3 (Strong), 2 (Medium) and 1 (Weak). 

Assessment of CO of courses

A course result should satisfy at least one or more of the program’s outcomes. These are the abilities, knowledge that students can display after course completion. CO attainment is calculated using the percentage of pupils who score over 80% in each measured criterion.

Attainment of PO and PSO

All of the courses that contribute to the PO are recognized, and are assessed using both direct and indirect assessments through the COs. The degree of achievement of each CO is compared to the specified targets for each course, and if they are not met, faculty offers ways to improve it.

2.6.3.

 

QnM

Pass percentage of Students during the year

 

  Data Requirement (As per Data Template)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tMb6tR5bI-6g-yvax8o3VYY9DaxSfISI/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

Link for the supporting documents:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bcZjCCUDCNJxT-hHMX_mPj17sypD5kq6/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

Link for the the document send by COE section:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PCaoOqe7_JW1AUpHAPggn087yhHQo3x6/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106040888050805601057&rtpof=true&sd=true

 

©2021 Powered by Institute of Engineering & Management
Exit mobile version