INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT

Criterion 2.5

 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms 

 

Metric 

No.

2.5.1.

QlM

Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode
Internal Assessment is conducted in the following modes:
1.Method 1 :

The Controller of Examination Section. In the pandemic the examinations were conducted online through Google classroom and proctoring was done via Google meet. Examination routine is given well ahead of the commencement of the exam. Peer reviewing of question papers is done. Exams are held under strict invigilation. Evaluation of copies are done by teachers and copies are shown to students to make them aware of the errors in their answer scripts. The marks are then displayed department wise and a copy of the marks is sent to the Controller of Examination Section. A strict deadline is maintained for completing the evaluation process and displaying the marks.

 2. Method2

Another method of internal assessment is giving assignments in each subject to students at certain intervals and the students are assessed on the basis of assignments. In pandemic the assignments are being given in Google classrooms and the students are given a deadline within which they have to upload the assignments in the Google classroom.

After each class online quizzes are conducted using the iemcrp software. This also reflects the attendance of the students and is a part of internal assessment. Giving projects and having seminars on the project work is another mode of internal assessment.

The weightage is taken from all the above modes of assessment and total marks out of 100 is sent as internal assessment marks to the COE section at the end of the semester.  30 % of these marks is taken as internal assessment weightage for end semester evaluation.

2.5.2.

QlM

Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient
Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances:

Grievance may be there due to error in question, incomplete question or question being out of syllabus. If any such grievance is reported at the examination hall then appropriate action is taken by the Controller of Examination. The grievance is at first verified with the respective department. Then at the time of copy evaluation the concerned examiners are notified to give full marks allotted to that question provided the student has attempted that particular question.

Mechanism to deal with marks related grievances:

The mid semester examination copies are shown to students by respective subject teachers of different departments after evaluation. So any grievance related to marks by the student is immediately clarified by the subject teacher and rectified if necessary. After this the mid semester marks are published by the departments.